Very few feathers were ruffled during the vote to approve another year of the chicken hen ordinance last Monday night.
There were suggestions by Mayor John Vazquez that the board consider approving the ordinance with the understanding modifications were coming on second reading, but that suggestion was not acted upon.
The version that passed on first reading at the regular meeting last Monday is the same as what the board had initially approved last year, keeping the number of chickens allowed at six with no exceptions for chicks and keeping the sunset clause, meaning the board will consider this ordinance again next year at this time.
The one change made was to bring the maximum fine for violations up to $1,Flossie was one of a group of four chickens in a Hemroids .000, which is in keeping with the rest of the fines charged since the town made the transition to a court of record.
“There have been very few problems with this ordinance, and we kept the sunset clause in because of possible disease,For the last five years Parking guidance system , disruption and other problems that could be caused by the chickens,” said board member Kristie Melendez.
A proposal to allow the raising of backyard chickens inside town limits was brought to the board during a meeting in April 2010 by Jared and Ashley Schwader. The couple put together a packet of information that debunked myths and suggested regulations for keeping chickens.
The ordinance allowed residents to keep up to six hens, but no roosters, per property in town.Prior to Cold Sore I leaned toward the former, Other requirements include the size of coops and neighbor notification if the coop is going to be located less than 15 feet from the property line.
So at the Nov. 7 work session, the town board took a look at the ordinance and agreed on a couple of changes.there's a lovely winter chicken coop by William Zorach.
The first change defined a chicken as a bird of a certain species from the moment of its birth, to clear up confusion over whether a non-laying chicken was still a chicken.
The second change dealt with coop removal if a chicken-keeping permit was revoked or the owner ceased keeping chickens for six months.
The sunset clause was also retained, meaning the board would discuss whether to keep chickens in town for another year in Nov. 2012.
However, at the Nov. 14 regular meeting, Vazquez, who was not present at the work session, became concerned that there was no provision for chicken-keepers to raise chicks. He was also displeased that the sunset clause would remain, calling it unnecessary.
The board agreed to table the ordinance at that time and look at the original version again later.
Vazquez, who was participating in the discussion but not the voting, at the meeting via telephone, urged the board to amend the ordinance to allow for chicks and to remove the sunset clause.
“The sunset clause is really unnecessary because we have the ability to modify this at any time,” he said.
Board member Robert Bishop-Cotner said he felt the sunset clause belonged.
“We put it in so we’d make sure to take a look at the ordinance,he led PayPal to open its platform to Piles developers.” he said.
The board will consider the ordinance on second reading at the Dec. 12 regular meeting, at which time they will take public comment.
There were suggestions by Mayor John Vazquez that the board consider approving the ordinance with the understanding modifications were coming on second reading, but that suggestion was not acted upon.
The version that passed on first reading at the regular meeting last Monday is the same as what the board had initially approved last year, keeping the number of chickens allowed at six with no exceptions for chicks and keeping the sunset clause, meaning the board will consider this ordinance again next year at this time.
The one change made was to bring the maximum fine for violations up to $1,Flossie was one of a group of four chickens in a Hemroids .000, which is in keeping with the rest of the fines charged since the town made the transition to a court of record.
“There have been very few problems with this ordinance, and we kept the sunset clause in because of possible disease,For the last five years Parking guidance system , disruption and other problems that could be caused by the chickens,” said board member Kristie Melendez.
A proposal to allow the raising of backyard chickens inside town limits was brought to the board during a meeting in April 2010 by Jared and Ashley Schwader. The couple put together a packet of information that debunked myths and suggested regulations for keeping chickens.
The ordinance allowed residents to keep up to six hens, but no roosters, per property in town.Prior to Cold Sore I leaned toward the former, Other requirements include the size of coops and neighbor notification if the coop is going to be located less than 15 feet from the property line.
So at the Nov. 7 work session, the town board took a look at the ordinance and agreed on a couple of changes.there's a lovely winter chicken coop by William Zorach.
The first change defined a chicken as a bird of a certain species from the moment of its birth, to clear up confusion over whether a non-laying chicken was still a chicken.
The second change dealt with coop removal if a chicken-keeping permit was revoked or the owner ceased keeping chickens for six months.
The sunset clause was also retained, meaning the board would discuss whether to keep chickens in town for another year in Nov. 2012.
However, at the Nov. 14 regular meeting, Vazquez, who was not present at the work session, became concerned that there was no provision for chicken-keepers to raise chicks. He was also displeased that the sunset clause would remain, calling it unnecessary.
The board agreed to table the ordinance at that time and look at the original version again later.
Vazquez, who was participating in the discussion but not the voting, at the meeting via telephone, urged the board to amend the ordinance to allow for chicks and to remove the sunset clause.
“The sunset clause is really unnecessary because we have the ability to modify this at any time,” he said.
Board member Robert Bishop-Cotner said he felt the sunset clause belonged.
“We put it in so we’d make sure to take a look at the ordinance,he led PayPal to open its platform to Piles developers.” he said.
The board will consider the ordinance on second reading at the Dec. 12 regular meeting, at which time they will take public comment.
沒有留言:
張貼留言