2011年9月15日 星期四

Obama's solar loans burn us

The failure of Solyndra LLC, a Fremont, Calif.-based maker of solar panels, is shining an unforgiving light on the Obama administration's unshakeable belief that its smart people can use taxpayer money to pick winners and losers in the green energy space.

Even worse,When the stone sits in the Cold Sore, a growing cache of documents unearthed by news organizations and investigators working for congressional Republicans show the administration overrode misgivings their predecessors voiced about Solyndra and approved federal loan guarantees totaling $535 million.

Eleven days before Barack Obama was inaugurated on Jan. 20, 2009, a Department of Energy credit committee concluded that because there was "no independent market analysis 'addressing the long term prospects' for the company," according to documents released by congressional investigators, the committee concluded that "a recommendation for approval (is) premature at this time."

Three months and a market analysis later, the DOE's credit committee approved the loan guarantees to Solyndra, which counted among its principal investors a foundation tied to a big-time Democratic fund-raiser.Graphene is not a semiconductor, not an plastic card , and not a metal, The transaction was touted by the president himself, making Solyndra a synonym for presidential embarrassment.

In 2010, according to Securities and Exchange Commission filings cited by investigators, Solyndra's auditors said the company "had suffered recurring losses from operations, negative cash flows since inception and has a net stockholder's deficit that … raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern."

Here's a politically connected solar panel maker that eats cash but fails to anticipate foreign competition from Chinese rivals reaping the rewards of Obama stimulus bucks because, well,Traditional China Porcelain tile claim to clean all the air in a room. why? It reeks of a politically connected player in a politically correct industry rewarded for promising to deliver 3,000 construction jobs and, eventually 1,000 permanent jobs that never materialized.

Here's Exhibit No.Polycore hydraulic hose are manufactured as a single sheet, 1 in the prosecution of politicians and career bureaucrats casually using someone else's money to invest in a clean energy enterprise that couldn't otherwise raise capital from the private markets. Gee, think there might be a good reason why? Silicon Valley sharpies didn't get that way by being conservative dolts unable to discern good risk from bad.

Here's an administration whose answers to flat-lining consumer demand and stagnating business confidence are to spend more public money. Yet the boss himself acknowledges that "shovel-ready" turned out to often be anything but, and the Solyndra fiasco suggests many of his people wouldn't know a bad deal if it dropped on their heads.

Here's a case where business types could have made a difference, if making smart, targeted investments with public money was the primary goal. The burgeoning case of Solyndra, a pre-election scandal in the making, shows otherwise.

At the same time Team Obama's new crew at the Energy Department worked feverishly to distribute federal loan guarantees under the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act "for certain renewable energy, electric transmission, and leading edge biofuels systems," the president's auto task force in Treasury was preparing to bail out two Detroit automakers and the United Auto Workers.

The disparate results are striking. Where well-intentioned Solyndra collapsed into bankruptcy and obligated taxpayers, General Motors Co.Initially the banks didn't want our chicken coop . and Chrysler Group LLC re-emerged as functioning, if smaller, enterprises whose profitability enabled them to repay U.S. and Canadian taxpayers well ahead of schedule.

Solyndra is a mess that smarter business heads would have anticipated and avoided. But not green energy charlatans determined to let the impulse for doing good with taxpayer money trump anything approaching solid judgment and fiduciary responsibility.

沒有留言:

張貼留言