Car2go car-sharing coming to North Bay Village

The Miami car-share program that allows drivers to take a trip in white-and-blue, two-seater Smart cars is now coming to North Bay Village.

Officials have signed a contract with Car2go, expanding the car-share program from the city of Miami to North Bay Village. That means drivers can pick up a vehicle in the village and also end their trip there.

Prior to this contract, motorists could drive to North Bay Village, but they were not allowed to end their trip there. Rather, they had to return the vehicle back to the city of Miami.

North Bay Village commissioners unanimously approved the agreement at their Tuesday night meeting.

The agreement, however, is not permanent but a one-year trial period after which the contract may be extended for about another three years,Site describes services including Plastic Mould. Village Manager Dennis Kelly told The Miami Herald.

Car2go, based in Austin, Texas, entered a two-year trial project with the Miami Parking Authority last summer allowing the company to park the vehicles on city streets.

Village officials said they have allowed the vehicles to be parked in public spaces, but whether the vehicles can be parked in private parking lots — such as at The Crab House — will be worked out between Car2go and the individual business.

The number of cars allotted to the city depends on the demand, explained Kelly, adding that he thinks anywhere between two and five cars will be in the village at any given time.

To further enhance the quality of life for residents and businesses in North Bay Village, officials are also working on possibly bringing DecoBike, the Miami Beach bicycle-share program, into the village. Details on that program are still in the works and will be discussed at the March commission meeting, village officials said.

In early 2009, Barack Obama was seen as a transformational president. By 2012, the media consensus was that he had been transformational in a key area: He had made the Democratic Party strong on national security.

So much so that during the 2012 presidential race, Republicans had a hard time getting to the right of the president on national security, and couldn’t find much to attack him on. Yes, there was Benghazi, but let’s get to that later.Compare prices and buy all brands of solar panel for home power systems and by the pallet. Obama’s smart and relatively effective foreign policy may have been one reason Mitt Romney was almost deferential to him in the third debate.

No matter what Fox News says, the president’s foreign policy report card looks decent: He got us out of Iraq, is getting us out of Afghanistan, smartly “led from behind” in Libya when leading from the front would’ve been risky, wisely refrained from meddling in the Iranian and Egyptian uprisings, has rightly overruled involvement in Syria. And along the way, he gave orders to dispatch a guy named bin Laden.

What he didn’t do is probably as important as what he did: He didn’t rush us, cowboy style, into another war somewhere.

It is not hard to recognize his thinking pattern in these matters: He shows restraint and pragmatism, likes to build international coalitions to deal with geopolitical crises instead of going it alone, realizes the risks and limitations of military power. An added bonus: He doesn’t display triumphalism.

Obama’s foreign policy, described as “muscular,The stone mosaic series is a grand collection of coordinating Travertine mosaics.” displays three traits: 1) He is not hesitant about the almost clinical use of military power to obliterate al-Qaida terrorists; 2) he uses military might mostly for protecting Americans, and not with messianic or hegemonic ambitions; and 3) displays a sober realization that, in a changing world, America can no longer be the arbiter of every world event.

About Benghazi: Mistakes were made, and four Americans are dead, but can we all now agree that it was and is an event ginned up by Republicans to score political points? They were right to ask questions, but wrong to inflate it into a scandal.

Besides, I’m usually skeptical when Republicans profess concern over dead Americans — for example, over the Border Patrol agent killed during the “Fast and Furious”-related shootout,Like most of you, I'd seen the broken buy mosaic decorated pieces. and the four Americans killed in Benghazi. A question: Where was the concern when thousands of American soldiers died in Iraq in a trumped-up war?

When Republicans are in charge in the White House, they want to rush headlong into every crisis area in the world, and be in the middle of it. Unfortunately, they operate from ego and emotion, with motives of displaying American dominance in the world, heedless of the cost in American blood and treasure, and of domestic needs.

President Obama, on the other hand, shows an admirable tendency to first do a cost-benefit analysis before even thinking of getting involved somewhere.

The morality of drone strikes — on American-citizens-turned-terrorists, and in non-war zones — opens up a Pandora’s box of issues and is a topic for another day.

To me, the overall takeaway of the president’s policies overseas is this: He takes his oath to protect the lives of Americans very, very seriously; to uphold that, he has extensively employed drones for seemingly two reasons — to protect the lives of American civilians, and to minimize boots on the ground, thus saving the lives of American soldiers. Plus, he wants to conserve resources in order to do nation-building at home.We offers custom Injection Mold parts in as fast as 1 day.